Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Yang Memuat Isi Akta Perdamaian Di Pengadilan Negeri Padang Kelas IA

Authors

  • Pernando Simbolon Advokat

Keywords:

Execution of Decisions, Peace Deeds, Industrial Relations Disputes

Abstract

Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes at the Padang IA class District Court as referred to in Decision Number 4 / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2018 / PN Pdg, the disputing parties have reconciled and a peace letter has been made, then submitted to the Panel of Judges to be included in a Court Decision, The Panel of Judges first examined the contents of the conciliation letter to make a peace deed, then the Panel of Judges On Monday, April 2 2018 read out a decision ordering the Plaintiff and Defendant to obey the contents of the Peace Deed. However, one of the parties did not carry out it so a request for the Execution of the Decision was carried out to the Chairperson of the Padang Class IA District Court but there was no legal certainty, the Chair of the Court should have warned and ordered that party to implement the Decision within no later than 8 days as guaranteed in Article 195- 208 HIR and Articles 224-225 HIR. The method used is sociological juridical meaning that research is carried out on the real situation of the community with the aim and purpose of finding facts (Fact Finding), which leads to identification (problem identification) which ultimately leads to problem solving. The results showed that the Foundation did not carry out its obligations according to the contents of the peace deed in the decision, then the Court was also unable to execute the decision because there was no budget from the State even though the PPHI Law had confirmed that the execution fee was free. The obstacle faced is that the Court did not find goods or assets belonging to the Foundation in the contents of the Peace Deed, so that the Court was unable to seize the execution. The solution found in this research is that the Plaintiff in the drafting of the Peace Agreement should include and clearly state the assets or assets owned by the Foundation, so that it can be used as collateral for execution if the Foundation does not implement the contents of the Peace Agreement Deed. The Chief Justice through the Registrar and Bailiff should be able to exercise the authority of execution in accordance with applicable legal provisions without being burdened by the absence of a budget for execution costs. The Chief Justice must make specific guidelines for the internal Court in carrying out the execution of Court Decisions or in other words the establishment of Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the Execution of Court Decisions.

References

Damanik, R. S. (2014). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Yang Nilai Gugatan Di Bawah Rp.150.000.000,- Di Pengadilan Negeri Pontianak. Gloria Yuris Jurnal Hukum, 2(3).

Erwin, Y. P. (2015). Kajian Yuridis Mengenai Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Dalam Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 12(4).

Harahap, I. H. (2019). Implikasi Hukum Terhadap Tidak Terlaksananya Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Perkara Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Negeri Pontianak). Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum, 1(1).

Harahap, Y. (2015). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafindo.

Khairani. (2018). Kepastian Hukum Hak Pekerja Outsourcing oleh Khairani. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Maryono, D., & Azhar, M. (2018). Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial: Beberapa Catatan Masukan RUU Hukum Acara Perdata. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 1(3), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v1i3.345-350

Nazhiva Anjani, Ummu Hilmy, R. D. P. H. (2019). Akibat Hukum Tidak Dieksekusinya Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Perselisihan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja. Jurnal Magister Kenotariatan Sriwijaya, 04(1).

Pangaribuan, J. (2010). Tuntunan Praktis Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Kerja. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Intitama Sejahtera.

Rifai, A. (2018). Wajah Hakim dalam Putusan : Studi atas Putusan Hakim Berdimensi Hak Asasi Manusia. Yogyakarta: Pusham UII. https://doi.org/10.37859/jp.v8i2.787

Soekanto, S. (2008). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Ugo, P. (2012). Hukum Acara Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial: Tata Cara dan Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Perburuhan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30