Penjatuhan Dan Eksekusi Putusan Pidana Tambahan Berupa Chemical Castration Terhadap Kejahatan Paedofil
Keywords:
Chemical Castration, Judge's Decision, Execution, AttorneyAbstract
The conviction of chemical castration decision, MABS is a breath of fresh air in law enforcement in Indonesia, but in this decision there are several problems that cause the prosecutor as the executor of the court decision to experience difficulties in the execution process so that an internal rule of the prosecutor's office is needed which serves as a guide for prosecutors in carrying out the execution of chemical castration. This paper will discuss: what are the judges' considerations in imposing additional punishment for chemical castration for perpetrators of sexual violence against children in a District Court decision? How are the efforts of the prosecutor as executor of the court's decision in executing the chemical castration dictum in the decision of the District Court? This article uses sociological legal research methods included in empirical research. The results showed that the verdict in An. Muh Aris bin Sukur is ultra petita in which the judge renders a verdict that exceeds the charges and demands of the prosecutor. In addition, the judge did not heed the written provisions in the Child Protection Law to include the length of time for the implementation of chemical castration in his decision. The independence of the judge in making a decision, the judge's oversight body does not have the authority to comment on the judge's decision and the appeal that has been made, but the PT Surabaya decision strengthens the Mojokerto District Court decision without any other legal remedy so that the decision is legally binding. Prosecutors have experienced difficulties in its implementation because the regulations regarding the minimum period for implementing chemical castration and the detailed instructions for its implementation have not been regulated so that the prosecutor as the executor of chemical castration needs a guideline that can be used as a reference in implementing chemical castration.
References
Adam Yuriswanto Ahmad Mahyani. (2018). Hukuman Kebiri Sebagai Pidana Tambahan dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Seksual. Jurnal Doktor Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 48.
Adonara, F. F. (2015). Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(1).
Antara. (2020). Tersangka Pencabulan Anak Di Bogor Ditangkap, Sempat Modifikasi Motor. Okezone.
Arto, A. M. (2015). Pembaruan Hukum Islam Melalui Putusan Hakim. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Dellyana Shant. (2018). Konsep Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Effendy, M. (2021). Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, Posisi dan Fungsinya dari Perspektif Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Gultom, M. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak dan Perempuan. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Guraba, S. (2020). Hasil wawancara dengan Jaksa pada Biro Hukum dan Luar Negeri Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia. 18 Desember.
Hadi., A. S. (2020). Hasil wawancara dengan Kepala Seksi Pidana Umum pada Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Mojokerto. 17 Desember.
Huda, C. (2006). Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kealahan. Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
Laurensius Arliman S. (2016). Prostitusi Anak Laki-Laki Sebagai Kegagalan Perlindungan Anak. Jurnal Hukum, 13(2).
Mardiy, N. Q. (2017). Penerapan Hukuman Kebiri Kimia Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Implementation of Chemical Castration Punishment For Sexual Offender. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(1).
Nashriana. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Pidana Bagi Anak Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Nawawi, H. (2012). Instrumen Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Purba, A. N. &. (2020). 3 Pembunuh Dan Pemerkosa Remaja 13 Tahun Di Lebak Ditangkap.
Putro, Y. H. (2020). Kronologi Kasus Kematian Yuyun Di Tangan 14 ABG Bengkulu. Liputan 6.
Rachmawati, E. (2020). Sisi Kelam Pariwisata di Pulau Dewata Terhadap Perlindungan Anak. Kompas, pp. 138–145.
Rahmiati, N. dan. (2018). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terkait Hal Yang Memberatkan Dan Meringankan Putusa. Jurnal Edudikara, 2(2), 3–5.
Ranuhandoko, I. P. . (2020). Terminologi Hukum (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Soponyono, N. H. H. & E. (2018). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Sanksi Kebiri Kimia Dalam Perspektif HAM Dan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Udayana Master Law Journal, 7(3).
Suwarnatha, I. N. N. (2018). Tujuan Pemidanaan Sanksi Tindakan Kebiri Kimia Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hukum Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2.
Waluyo, B. (2016). Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Widiantari, K. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Yang Dijatuhi Pidana Pelatihan Kerja. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 46(4), 299–307.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Soumatera Law Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
